Cases 21 - 30 of 496
Epps v. Rice
as 3:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
Clarence B. Epps
Defendant:
Warden Rice
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Epps v. Rice
as 4:2021cv00046
Petitioner:
Clarence B. Epps
Respondent:
Warden Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strong v. Department of Corrections for The State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00207
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Nathan B. Cain and Department of Corrections for The State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Anthony Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Mills
as 2:2021cv00009
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Andrew Mills
Plaintiff:
John B. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruffin v. Porter et al
as 3:2020cv00335
Defendant:
Warden J.J. Williams, D. Warden B. Tyler, Sgt. L. Pigeon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D. Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Vasco v. Withers
as 3:2020cv00794
Defendant:
Shannon B. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Guillermo F. Vasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lowe v. Mills
as 4:2020cv00213
Respondent:
Andrew Mills
Petitioner:
John B Lowe and John B. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dickson v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00735
Defendant:
Lisa Sunderman, All Federal Agent(s)/Correctional Officials at the Medical Department, Mr Dowg and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kerr Dickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bouterse v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Paula A. Wolff, Archie B. Longley, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Dino Delano Bouterse
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Attorney Fred A. Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Warden Frank Shaw, MDOC, Major Christopher Dykes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Broderick B. Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
