Cases 21 - 30 of 2,825
Hanks v. Ashcraft et al
as 3:2024cv03051
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hanks
Defendant:
Kathy Ashcraft, Brittany Greene, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seats v. Doty et al
as 3:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Devin C. Seats
Defendant:
B Doty, Anthony Wills and Lt Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Latham et al
as 1:2024cv02673
Plaintiff:
Charles Levon Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Latham, Sgt. Mendoza, C/O Bernal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant v. Will County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 1:2024cv02719
Plaintiff:
Armani D Gant
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Facility, J. Oliver, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yamini v. Richards et al
as 3:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Dorian Yamini
Defendant:
B Richards, Robin Bortok, Dr. David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brough v. Gallaway et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Maurice Brough
Defendant:
Warden Gallaway, C/O White, Lt. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Deandre Davis
Defendant:
C/O Baker, Christopher Kern, Matthew Dulaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carillo v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Victor Carillo
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, C. Santiago and J. Capilupo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magnotti v. Briddick et al
as 4:2024cv04026
Plaintiff:
Angalo C Magnotti
Defendant:
Thomas Briddick, George Leynard and Jim Andreoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
