Cases 21 - 30 of 491
Faulk v. Corporal Mandela et al
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Lee Faulk
Defendant:
Corporal Mandela, Lieutenant K. Kim, Sargeant Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munn v. Clark et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Lester Joe Munn
Defendant:
Sandra Clark and Jimmy Sission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Tondom Clark
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Munn v. Clark et al
as 5:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Lester Joe Munn
Defendant:
Sandra Clark, Michael Bates, Jimmy Sission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Gruver, J Clark, Skeggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Mr M Gruver, Mr J Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Mr J Clark, Ms J Rodriguez, Mr R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Jones et al
as 6:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Marcus Scott and Marcus Scott Bey
Defendant:
Unknown Jones, Albert Arnold, Sgt Larry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Clarke, et al.
as 5:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Lowell DeQuincy Green
Defendant:
Judge Ron Clarke, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Premium Warez Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
