Cases 21 - 30 of 200
SMART v. LEITH et al
as 1:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
WARDEN MATTHEW LEITH and COUNTY OF BURLINGTON BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMART v. EYNON et al
as 1:2022cv01751
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
LINDA EYNON, WARDEN MATTHEW LEITH and COUNTY OF BURLINGTON BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv19648
Petitioner:
JUAN F HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. HICKS et al
as 3:2021cv14258
Plaintiff:
RANDY KAREEM WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, F. ALBIANO, STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLINS v. GIAMMARINO
as 3:2021cv10176
Plaintiff:
VAUGHN COLLINS
Defendant:
F. GIAMMARINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv10123
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
EDWARD PITTMAN
Petitioner:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUZMAN CABRERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv06166
Plaintiff:
JOSE F. GUZMAN CABRERA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TIEDEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv04326
Plaintiff:
VAUGN F. TIEDEMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN GUY CIRILLO, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv04199
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KAETZ and WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DIST COURT, DISTRICT OF NJ, CFG MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
