Cases 21 - 30 of 1,627
Simpkins v. FNU Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCathertan, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DARRELL DANIELS
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, JULIE JONES, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Cordney v. Dixxon et al
as 4:2024cv10033
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yvonne Dixxon, Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PADGETT et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A JOHNSON
Defendant:
R PADGETT and R GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv00765
Petitioner:
Demetrius D. Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mann v. Lindsey et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jamar Mann
Defendant:
J. Lindsey, Tomlin, S. Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Atteberry
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Atteberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelosi-Dahl v. Johnson
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Zachary V. Pelosi-Dahl
Defendant:
Julie Crews Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Hasan H. Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Cook, FNU Shinn, FNU Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 8:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
Officer Wissinger, Mr. McCathertan, Mr. Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
