Cases 21 - 30 of 481
Aguilar v. Tafelmeyer et al
as 3:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
David Aguilar
Defendant:
J. Tafelmeyer, Joseph Johnson, Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Ford et al
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Aaron D. Ford, Joseph M Lombardo, Brian E. Williams Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latorre v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jorge Latorre
Defendant:
Brown, Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv01399
Petitioner:
Keair Boyd
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keller v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Keller
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Julie Williams, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, A.W Toliver, A.W. Dressen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willequer v. Sisolak, et al
as 2:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Thomas Willequer
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Michael Minev, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillen v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Gillen
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Brian Williams, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
James Underwood
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Marks et al
as 3:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Timothy H. Johnson
Defendant:
Dana Marks, E Parks, J. Mainwaring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
