Cases 21 - 30 of 587
BROWN v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN MIKE KELLY, SGT. LISA JOHNSON, DON GEIGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DANTICO et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL DANTICO and FATIMA S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BACON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv06866
Plaintiff:
JOEL BACON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, JENISE SANTOS-COLON and ISIAH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. NUESTEADUR et al
as 1:2022cv06492
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE NUESTEADUR, JUDGE MICHAEL DONIO, JUDGE JAMES E. ISMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. KUHN et al
as 1:2022cv06381
Plaintiff:
RANDY JOHNSON
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHN and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv06307
Petitioner:
ANTHONY T. JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JAMES SLAUGHTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv05497
Petitioner:
JEROME JOHNSON
Respondent:
WARDEN KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv05207
Petitioner:
TONYE JOHNSON
Respondent:
STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY WARDEN et al
as 1:2022cv04624
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JOHNSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY WARDEN, MEDICAL STAFF and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. KUHN et al
as 2:2022cv04453
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., DAVID RICHARDS, T. CORTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
