Cases 21 - 30 of 118
Jackson v. Perry et al
as 2:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
David J Perry and Asst. Warden Juan J Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez and Placido Samaniego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Kuku et al
as 6:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Odunay O Kuku, Assistant Warden LaMorris Marshall, Assistant Warden Juan J Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Anciso et al
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Pricsylla Anciso, Juan Nunez, Skinner Sturgis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nunez-Araujo v. USA
as 4:2022cv00663
Petitioner:
Jesus Nunez-Araujo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Nunez-Reynoso v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00167
Petitioner:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Trevino et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Rosalinda Trevino and Juan Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez-Reynoso v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reynoso v. Reeves County Detention Center III
as 2:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
Agustin Nunez Reynoso
Respondent:
Reeves County Detention Center III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
