Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Balam v. Forrest County, et al
as 2:2021cv00070
Defendant:
Charlie Sims, Forrest County MS Regional Jail, Canine Officer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Darius Pe-Shaun Balam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Sims et al
as 2:2021cv00028
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Sheriff Charlie Sims and Forrest County Sheriff Department Jail
Plaintiff:
Stormy Joe Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conklin v. Sims
as 2:2020cv00104
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Charlie Sims
Plaintiff:
Justin Peter Conklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Conklin v. Forrest County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Forrest County Circuit Court, Charlie Sims, Matthew Shoemaker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Justin Peter Conklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Burchell
as 2:2020cv00065
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Patricia Burchell and Charlie Sims
Plaintiff:
Roderick Devon Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Uknown Gills, Connie Pierce, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Hogan et al
as 3:2018cv00461
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Corey O'Neal Sims
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Norris Hogan, Quincy Dukes and D. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Sims
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sims v. Hogan et al
as 3:2018cv00243
Plaintiff:
Corey O'Neal Sims
Defendant:
Norris Hogan, D. Chapman and Quincy Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Lonnie E. Sims, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Unknown Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
