Cases 21 - 30 of 257
Trevino v. Hale County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Ronnie-Lee Trevino
Defendant:
Hale County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 9:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Ramiro Trevino
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Trevino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Ramiro Trevino
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Trevino et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Rosalinda Trevino and Juan Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Peel et al
as 4:2022cv02330
Plaintiff:
Raul Adame Trevino
Defendant:
Mike Peel, Former Warden Smith, Grant Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghanbari Trevino v. Viramontes et al
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ali Louis Vaysi Ghanbari Trevino
Defendant:
FNU Viramontes, John Doe #1 1:22-cv-101, John Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Harris County et al
as 4:2022cv02147
Plaintiff:
Shannon Stafford
Defendant:
Harris County, Constable Silvia Trevino, Constable J. Chairez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Trevino et al
as 7:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bell
Defendant:
Sgt Trevino, L. Webb and J. Gauna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Price
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Andrew Trevino
Defendant:
Timothy Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoneham v. DeLeon et al
as 5:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Frank Stoneham
Defendant:
Michael DeLeon, Velia Meza, District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
