Cases 21 - 30 of 905
Burke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00527
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Andrew McMillan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Liscano v. Ligon et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Liscano
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Ligon, Lt. A. Ligon, Sgt. Andrew Ligon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv02720
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Maldonado
Defendant:
State of Texas, Dallas County Adult Probation, SRT Officers and others
Interested Party:
Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayer v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00785
Petitioner:
Karl Andrew Mayer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGrew v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGrew
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bryan Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. State Of Texas
as 6:2023cv00547
Petitioner:
Ira Andrew Cartwright
Respondent:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cartwright v. State Of Texas
as 9:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
Ira Andrew Cartwright
Respondent:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
