Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Barlow v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2014cv00314
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Barlow
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Morris v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2013cv00160
Petitioner:
Charles Ervin Morris
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Adam D Rigby, Dezmon R Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Miller et al
as 6:2011cv00378
Defendant:
Steve Miller , Stephen Barlow , Preston McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Steven K Waller
Amicu:
Texas Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Miller et al
as 9:2011cv00128
Defendant:
Steve Miller , Stephen Barlow , Preston McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Steven K Waller
Amicu:
Texas Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burden v. Maness et al
as 1:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alan Burden
Defendant:
Tom Maness, Ann Manes, David W Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Liesby
as 1:2009cv00808
Plaintiff:
Charles Barlow
Defendant:
UP Liesby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. Broussard et al
as 9:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Willis Floyd Wiley
Defendant:
Broussard, Unidentified Putin, Unidentified Christen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keil v. Barlow
as 1:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
Clarence Wayne Keil
Defendant:
David W Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barlow v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2007cv00058
Petitioner:
Vonderic Barlow
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barlow v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv00156
Petitioner:
Vonderic Barlow
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
