Cases 21 - 30 of 152
Baughman v. Wainwright et al
as 1:2020cv01058
Defendant:
Johnathan Teaff, Michale Sizemore, Rachell West and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baughman v. Bowman et al Case transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 4:2020cv03588
Defendant:
Melissa Ballard, Johnathan Teaff, Vernon Mitchel and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. CMC Pharmacy et al
as 4:2020cv03605
Defendant:
CMC Pharmacy, Betty Williams, Mark A Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Clint Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Rochester et al
as 5:2020cv01211
Plaintiff:
Deionthay Harper
Defendant:
Patricia M. Rochester, Christy K. Solis, Michael Rockenbough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 7:2020cv00118
Respondent:
Daniel Stover, Beth Bartlett, Sgt. FNU Keeter and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 6:2020cv00825
Defendant:
Daniel Stover, Assist. Warden M. Feazell, Warden FNU Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Williams et al
as 4:2020cv02938
Defendant:
Khari Mott, Estelle Medical Department, Betty J. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baughman v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Johnathan Teaff, Rachell West, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Williams et al
as 4:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Warden Wilkerson, Betty Jo Williams and "Head" Representative For CMHC/TDCJ Physical Therapy
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles et al
as 4:2019cv04256
Defendant:
Gerald Nixon, Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles, Pamela Thielke and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Gene Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
