Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Natt v. Prison Officials
as 1:2022cv04701
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Defendant:
Prison Officials, Prison Official Pollard, Prison Official Dukes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinnon v. Bryan County, Georgia Sheriff Deputy #1 et al
as 4:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Robert McKinnon, III
Defendant:
Bryan County, Georgia Sheriff Deputy #1, Bryan County, Georgia Sheriff Sergeant Hatfield (Deputy #2), Bryan County, Georgia Superior Court Magistrate Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS v. MACON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
BRYAN CHRISTOPHER MATHIS
Defendant:
MACON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, RONALD DUNCAN and BOB LADD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States Of America v. Thompson
as 2:2021cv00110
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Respondent:
Bryan Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mike v. Adams
as 4:2021cv00322
Petitioner:
David R. Mike
Respondent:
Warden Bryan Adams
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mike v. Adams
as 1:2021cv04521
Petitioner:
David R. Mike
Respondent:
Bryan Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Houston v. Adams
as 1:2021cv03100
Petitioner:
Bradley Houston
Respondent:
Bryan Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mike v. Adams et al
as 6:2021cv00053
Plaintiff:
David Mike
Defendant:
Warden Bryan Adams, Captain Jackson, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston et al v. Adams et al
as 6:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Bradley M. Houston and David Mike
Defendant:
Warden Bryan Adams, Captain Jackson, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
