Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Easley v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
Dana Judd, Donald Morgan, Kathy Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Forshey, et al
as 4:2013cv02642
Petitioner:
DaJuan Burns
Respondent:
Jay Forshey and Mike DeWine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raglin v. Farley et al
as 4:2011cv02146
Petitioner:
Donell Raglin
Respondent:
Robert L. Farley and M. Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mubashshir et al v. Moore et al
as 3:2010cv02802
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Edward Sheldon, Jaquelyn Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Earl Davis v. J.T. Shartle, et al
as 4:2010cv02592
Petitioner:
James Earl Davis
Respondent:
J. T. Shartle, Sweeney, Yemma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mubashshir et al v. Moore et al
as 3:2010cv02591
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Warren Burbury, Jaquelyn Burn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mubashshir et al
as 3:2010cv02501
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Warren Burbury, Jaquelyn Burn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Provenzale v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2010cv02373
Plaintiff:
Anthony Provenzale
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institute - Elkton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCloud v. Lappin et al
as 4:2010cv01814
Petitioner:
James Graham McCloud
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, J.T. Shartle, Kathy Coles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
