Cases 21 - 30 of 81
KELLEY v. ODUM et al
as 1:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHRIS KELLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL ALAN ODUM, ASHLEIGH D HEADRICK, SAMUEL S OLENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Atlanta Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Omari Akile Smith
Defendant:
City of Atlanta Police Department, Nicole K. Esquilin and Fani T. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2016cv03573
Plaintiff:
John James Amos, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Municipal Court of Atlanta, Elaine Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANVILLE v. SAMUEL et al
as 1:2016cv01995
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ugene Granville
Defendant:
CORDEL SAMUEL, CATHERINE ROBINSON, LEWIS SLANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANVILLE v. SAMUEL et al
as 4:2016cv00180
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND UGENE GRANVILLE
Defendant:
CORDEL SAMUEL, CATHERINE ROBINSON, LEWIS SLANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv01020
Plaintiff:
Roberto Sandoval
Defendant:
State of Georgia, City of Atlanta, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windham v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2016cv00969
Plaintiff:
Corey Eugene Windham
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Fulton County Jail and U. S. Patent Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. City of Atlanta Police Headquarter et al
as 1:2016cv00567
Plaintiff:
Omar Jamel Dotson
Defendant:
City of Atlanta Police Headquarter, T. Gilliard and Duff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espinoza v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
William Espinoza
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Decatur County Sheriff Office, City of Atlanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
