Cases 21 - 30 of 276
Cole Sr. v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02657
Petitioner:
Gary Anthony Cole Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cadenhead v. Collin County Detention Facility et al
as 4:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Cecil Allen Rusty Cadenhead
Defendant:
Collin County Detention Facility, Sheriff Skinner, Officer Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peguero v. Warden Cole et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Natanael Peguero
Defendant:
Warden Cole, GEO Group Inc., Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Rowe et al
as 5:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Woodson
Defendant:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe, Five Star Food Service, Well Path Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desmarais v. Bell County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
John Desmarais
Defendant:
Bell County Sheriff's Office, City of Belton Police Department, City of Temple Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Straughn et al
as 5:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Nelson
Defendant:
Captain NFN Straughn, Wesley Hendrix, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wallace et al
as 6:2021cv01301
Plaintiff:
Tamarcus Scott
Defendant:
CO FNU Wallace, Lt. FNU Craft, FNU Sowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00214
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cole v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv01124
Petitioner:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cole v. Davis et al
as 4:2021cv03050
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr.
Defendant:
L Davis, Bobby Lumpkin and Correctional Officer Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
