Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Cook v. Fox et al
as 3:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Brian George William Cook
Defendant:
Justin Fox, R. Phelps, Brian Pecor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Okpala v. Vasquez et al
as 5:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Okey Garry Okpala
Defendant:
FNU Vasquez, FNU Lacy, FNU Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Shaw
as 1:2014cv00188
Petitioner:
Coby Cook
Respondent:
Frank Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook v. USA
as 2:2012cv00218
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bridgette Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coleman v. Collier et al
as 2:2012cv00019
Petitioner:
Charles D. Coleman, Sr.
Defendant:
Wanda Collier, Mack Grimmett, Kelvin Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 2:2011cv00123
Plaintiff:
Richard Flores
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, M. Martinez, R. W. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Scott County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Donnie Richard Cook
Defendant:
Scott County, Mississippi and Newton County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dearing v. Monroe County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2010cv00055
Petitioner:
D'Wayne Dearing
Respondent:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, Dusty Rollison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pulido v. Adams et al
as 2:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sergio Gonzalez Pulido
Defendant:
R. Adams, Jr., T. McDonald, D. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crook v. Cook et al
as 2:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Crook
Defendant:
Tommy Cook, Synorous Green, Ed Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
