Cases 21 - 30 of 37
McBride v. Paramo et al
as 3:2013cv01732
Petitioner:
James Dee McBride
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Dee Clark v. P D Brazelton
as 2:2013cv04206
Respondent:
P D Brazelton
Petitioner:
Gregory Dee Clark
Lamond D Moore v. Randy Grounds
as 2:2012cv08406
Respondent:
Randy Grounds
Petitioner:
Lamond Dee Moore
Pritchett v. King
as 1:2012cv01333
Petitioner:
Jessie Dee Pritchett
Respondent:
Audrey King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 2:2011cv09123
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California
Intervenor:
S. Baek, S. Dado, G. Hinkle and others
Defendant:
Bush, Matthew Cates, B. Flores and others
Unknown:
David A. Carrillo, Samantha H. Ramsey, Samantha H. Ramsey and others
916) 324-5205 (fax:
James Edmund Flynn, Constance Lee Picciano, Constance Lee Picciano and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
T. Nguyen, C. Russ, Spotted Eagle Circle and others
Plaintiff:
William Rouser
530) 752-5788 (fax:
Carter Capps White
Cabrera v. Dee et al
as 3:2011cv02676
Plaintiff:
Ediberto Cabrera
Defendant:
Dee and Dennis Diagre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tippetts v. Butte County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2009cv01434
Plaintiff:
Travis Dee Tippetts
Defendant:
Butte County Sheriff's Dept., Muto, Morehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Lewis, et al
as 1:2010cv02278
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dee Young
Defendant:
J. Lewis, Anthony Hedgpeth, K - Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Lewis, et al
as 2:2009cv01030
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dee Young
Defendant:
J. Lewis, Anthony Hedgpeth, K - Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mora et al
as 1:2008cv01283
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dee Williams
Defendant:
James Mora, Houng, CA Board of Prison Terms and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
