Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Dopp v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
Richard L Dopp
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randy Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Jones et al
as 6:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Rickey L. Sheppard
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Debbie Morton, Randall Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 10-7098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, MICHAEL JACKSON and others
Dopp v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv01198
Plaintiff:
Richard L Dopp
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randy Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Payne, et al
as 10-7075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES H PAYNE, U.S. District Judge, FRANK H. SEAY, U.S. District Judge, RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden, OSP and others
Berryhill v. Payne et al
as 6:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
James H. Payne, Frank H. Seay, Randall Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathey v. Jones et al
as 6:2010cv00220
Plaintiff:
Bill R. Cathey
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Debbie Morton, Michael Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Aldridge, et al
as 10-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ALDRIDGE, D & E Unit Manager, OSP, AMY THOMAS, D Unit Case Manager, OSP, BRIAN HOLDEN, D Unit Mental Health Officer, OSP and others
Berryhill v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Jari Askins, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
