Cases 21 - 30 of 48
King v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv14256
Plaintiff:
Deric King
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Osvaldo Vidal, Anthony Mandonza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Rodrigues et al
as 1:2015cv13216
Plaintiff:
Tyler Raymond Norton
Defendant:
Michael Rodrigues, Osvaldo Videl, Brian McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Lubelczyk et al
as 1:2015cv12993
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wall
Defendant:
Rebecca Lubelczyk, Thomas Groblewski, Adrianna Carrillo, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abernathy v. Dewey et al
as 1:2015cv10431
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Shawn Dewey, John Doe #1, Michael Rumery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seams v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2014cv13301
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Seams
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Raymond Marchilli, Phillip Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duna v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2013cv12033
Plaintiff:
Alex Duna
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement , Plymouth County Sheriff's Department and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hicks v. Hodgson et al
as 1:2013cv10997
Plaintiff:
Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas M. Hodgson , George Vose, Jake Gadsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malouf v. Devens F.M.C et al
as 1:2013cv10036
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Malouf
Defendant:
Devens F.M.C, Turner, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2012cv11780
Plaintiff:
Jose Claudio
Defendant:
Claudio Mendoza, Duquette and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sabree v. Mendosa et al
as 1:2012cv11742
Plaintiff:
G Saif Sabree
Defendant:
Anthony Mendosa, Christopher Hyde, Pamela O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
