Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Newsome v. Mewis et al
as 1:2012cv00782
Defendant:
William Paul Mewis and Kristine Woldy
Plaintiff:
Edward Roy Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsome v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2012cv00736
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Edward Roy Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsome v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Edward Roy Newsome
Defendant:
NFN Hendrix, Daner Mitchell and NFN Adam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Newsome v. Uy, et al
as 11-10246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME, also known as Edward R. Newsome
Defendant - Appellee:
NFN UY, Doctor, S. TENORIO, CHAVEZ and others
Edward Newsome v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-10230
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Edward Newsome v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-10196
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME, also known as Edward R. Newsome
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Edward Newsome v. Uy, et al
as 10-11183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME, also known as Edward R Newsome
Defendant - Appellee:
NFN UY, Doctor, S TENORIO, CHAVEZ and others
Edward Newsome v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-11109
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Edward Newsome v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-11074
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME, also known as Edward R. Newsome
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Newsome v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2010cv00242
Petitioner:
Edward Roy Newsome
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
