Cases 21 - 30 of 269
Anderson v. L. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04726
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
L. Smith, Harris County Sherriff's Department, Harris County Jail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Resendez v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv04433
Petitioner:
Noel Resendez
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dyer v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv04671
Petitioner:
Jonathan Dyer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv04435
Plaintiff:
Brett Johnson
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hughes v. Judge Ana Martinez et al
as 4:2023cv04478
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Judge Ana Martinez, Bryan Collier, Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. State of Texas
as 4:2023cv04755
Petitioner:
Dennis W. Greer, Jr.
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv04190
Plaintiff:
Frank Baker
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Detention Officer Vickers and Detention Officer Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv04281
Plaintiff:
Cedric Brown
Defendant:
Sherrif Ed Gonzalez, Inmate Bank and Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
Ernest Charles Thompson
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Francina Carr and Rene Hinojosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Cruz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03965
Petitioner:
Andrea De La Cruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
