Cases 21 - 30 of 693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carr v. R.S.W. Jail
as 7:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
R.S.W. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Washington County TN Jail
as 7:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Washington County TN Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) et al
as 3:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Edward Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), The Police Department in Richmond and The Department of Juvenile Justice (Beaumont)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Middle River Regional Jail
as 7:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) et al
as 7:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Edward Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), The Police Department in Richmond and The Department of Juvenile Justice (Beaumont)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoner v. Warden, FCI Petersburg Medium
as 3:2023cv00643
Petitioner:
Shane Edward Stoner
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Petersburg Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beasley v. Leabough et al
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Beasley
Defendant:
Larry Leabough, Tojuanna Mack, Edward Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
