Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Price v. Bolling et al
as 2:2018cv00628
Plaintiff:
Jarell Damone Price
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Errole Pickens and Jeffrey Baldwin
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Bolling et al
as 2:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jovorr Aswon Fletcher
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Errol Pickens and Jefrey Baldwin
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Maurice et al
as 2:2017cv01503
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes, III
Defendant:
Wendy Maurice, Errol Pickens, Ronald Tew and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Bolling et al
as 2:2017cv01294
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Angela Miree, Errol Pickens and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabry v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2017cv01150
Plaintiff:
Darrious Mabry
Defendant:
Muhammed Jenkins, Tamberlyn Cook and Errol Pickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Bolling et al
as 2:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lamont Green
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Angela Miree, Errol Pickens and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Belue v. Leon Bolling, et al
as 17-10386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD RAY BELUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LEON BOLLING, JEFFERSON S DUNN, ROBERT BENTLEY and others
Belue v. Bolling et al
as 2:2016cv01896
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Belue
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 5:2016cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 5:2015cv00792
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
