Cases 21 - 30 of 60
YOUGH v. ADMINISTRATOR DAVIS et al
as 2:2017cv06366
Plaintiff:
STANFORD YOUGH
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR DAVIS, CINDY FORD, CONNIE O. KARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. ESSEX COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2017cv04864
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FORD
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY JAIL, CHARLES GREEN, CENTER FAMILY GROUP (CFG) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06669
Plaintiff:
CHARLTON JAMES FORD, SR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06178
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS FORD BANKS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. FORD-SINGLETARY et al
as 1:2016cv05297
Plaintiff:
NAZARIO BROOKS
Defendant:
COREY FORD-SINGLETARY, JOSEPH BETHEA and GLASSBORO NEW JERSEY POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv03857
Petitioner:
KELVIN FORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02017
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS , EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON , PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORSAINVIL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2016cv02016
Plaintiff:
WEDPENS DORSAINVIL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION , PATRICK NOGAN , CINDY FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BALLISTER v. UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S HOMOCIDE TASK FORCE et al
as 2:2015cv07655
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J BALLISTER, III
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S HOMOCIDE TASK FORCE, JORGE JIMENEZ, ROBERT HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCRAY v. PENNELL et al
as 3:2015cv05913
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MCCRAY
Defendant:
ARTHUR PENNELL, ANDREW CHENCHARIK, J. PUTKOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
