Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Firewalker-Fields v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
David N. Firewalker-Fields
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Dept. of Corrections and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houslin v. Crawford et al
as 1:2022cv00535
Petitioner:
Shawn Houslin
Respondent:
Jeffrey Crawford, ICA - Farmville Detention Center, Lyle Boelens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Streeval, A.W. Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Allen v. Hurley et al
as 7:2021cv00641
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Defendant:
B. Hurley, Larry Fields, G.V. Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Hess et al
as 7:2021cv00564
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Taylor
Defendant:
M. Hess, Fields and D. Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firewalker-Fields v. Elam et al
as 1:2021cv01113
Plaintiff:
David N. Firewalker-Fields
Defendant:
Marcus Elam, Ivan Gilmore and Ms. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Idrissi v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2021cv00541
Petitioner:
Kamal El Idrissi
Respondent:
Attorney General, Security of the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Ice Field Office Director for the Eastern District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
