Cases 21 - 30 of 116
Williams v. Maynard et al
as 1:2013cv02561
Plaintiff:
Scotland Williams
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, J. Michael Stouffer, Bobby P. Shearin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Layne v. Green et al
as 8:2013cv01933
Plaintiff:
James D Layne
Defendant:
Kathleen S. Green, Martin O'Malley, Gary D. Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal-El v. Beitzel et al
as 8:2013cv01838
Plaintiff:
Craig Neal-El
Defendant:
Chaplain D. Beitzel, Frank Bishop and Gary D. Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Maynard et al
as 1:2013cv01639
Plaintiff:
DeJesus Collins
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Jon Galley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Maynard et al
as 1:2013cv01579
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brown
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Roderick Sowers and Jason Clem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sowers et al
as 1:2013cv01333
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brown
Defendant:
Roderick Sowers, Wolfe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland-El v. Maynard et al
as 1:2013cv01251
Plaintiff:
Archie Holland-El
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, David Barthlow, Scott Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-El v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00893
Plaintiff:
Russell Smith-El
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc. , Mark W. Halle, Corizon Healthcare Medical Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv00862
Plaintiff:
Samuel Neal
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Ava Joubert and Gary D. Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gunn v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv00645
Plaintiff:
William Gunn
Defendant:
Thomas Williams, John Wolfe and Gary D. Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
