Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Sullivan v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2019cv00995
Defendant:
Matthew Ingram, David Kovachevich, Dr. Michael Seale and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Andrew Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaefer v. Mutchler et al
as 3:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Defendant:
Craig Gabriel, Wade Mutchler, Gary Adler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Applegate v. Hollingsworth et al
as 6:2018cv02218
Defendant:
J. Nelson, Steven Borst, John Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cain
as 2:2018cv01688
Petitioner:
Shawn Gary Williams
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oster v. Gulick et al
as 2:2018cv01509
Plaintiff:
Gary Oster
Defendant:
Dr. Bryon Hemphill, Garth Gulick, MD, Bryon Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Applegate v. Kelly et al
as 6:2018cv01060
Petitioner:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly and O.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lasher v. Efremoff et al
as 3:2018cv00525
Defendant:
Brianne Efremoff and Gary Miner
Plaintiff:
Lena Lasher
OR BOP:
Oregon State Board of Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Brown et al
as 6:2017cv00218
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Patty Cress, Leslie Farerra and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. Cain
as 2:2016cv02076
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Tracy Gary Shannon Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tarabochia v. City of Seaside, Oregon et al
as 3:2016cv01603
Defendant:
City of Seaside, Oregon, Clatsop County, Oregon, Estate of Jason Gooding and others
Plaintiff:
Loren Christopher Tarabochia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
