Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Williams v. Correctional Health Care et al
as 2:2014cv00452
Plaintiff:
Travis Delany Williams
Defendant:
Correctional Health Care, Nurse Leslie, Nurse Tom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Patton et al
as 2:2014cv00381
Plaintiff:
Tarence Banks
Defendant:
Racine County Jail Correctional Health Care, Nurse Leslie, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salim v. Carlson et al
as 2:2011cv01118
Plaintiff:
Muhannad Salim
Defendant:
Robert Carlson, CO Latham, CO Emper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Holinka
as 3:2009cv00399
Petitioner:
Aldifonso Gonzales
Respondent:
C. Holinka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mabra v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2008cv00475
Plaintiff:
Monte R Mabra
Defendant:
Gonzales, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Barbara Framer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007cv00852
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, Russell D Feingold, Dave Obey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hussain v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00268
Petitioner:
Mohammad Azam Hussain, Mohammad Azam Hussain and Mohammad Azam Hussain
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Alberto R Gonzales, Deborah Achim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hussain v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00268
Petitioner:
Mohammad Azam Hussain, Mohammad Azam Hussain and Mohammad Azam Hussain
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Deborah Achim, Thomas Polsin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brum v. Gonzales
as 2:2007cv00196
Petitioner:
Michael Brum
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
