Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Gonzalez-Reyna v. Ellis et al
as 1:2009cv00522
Plaintiff:
Adelmo Ely Gonzalez-Reyna
Defendant:
E. Ellis, L. Ray and Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Toney et al
as 1:2008cv01166
Petitioner:
Jose Fernandez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Earnest Toney, Mary Loiselle, John P. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00689
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00655
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Wilson v. Crouch et al
as 7:2007cv00433
Plaintiff:
John Wilson
Defendant:
Robert P. Crouch, Jr., Joseph W.H. Mott, Alberto Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dekle v. O'Brien et al
as 7:2006cv00755
Petitioner:
William E Dekle
Respondent:
Warden Terry O'Brien and Alberto Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. Gonzalez
as 2:2007cv00213
Petitioner:
Harold Campbell
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 7:2007cv00222
Petitioner:
Patricia Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
