Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Jiles v. Orleans Parish Prison et al
as 2:2009cv08426
Plaintiff:
Roland Jiles
Defendant:
Orleans Parish Prison Medical Clinic and Ham Dr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gusman et al
as 2:2009cv07006
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Marlin Gusman, Marlin Gusman, Dr. Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ham v. Cain et al
as 2:2009cv04194
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ham
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garner v. Richland Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2009cv00670
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Garner
Defendant:
Richland Parish Detention Center, Ham, A Cupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lattier v. Cupp et al
as 3:2009cv00339
Plaintiff:
Tobias M Lattier
Defendant:
Allen Cupp, Ham, Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Woolens v. Cupp et al
as 3:2009cv00340
Defendant:
Allen Cupp, Ham, Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Woolens
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniels v. Cupp et al
as 3:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
Charlie Daniels
Defendant:
Allen Cupp, Ham, Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. Cupp et al
as 3:2009cv00344
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Defendant:
Allen Cupp, Ham, Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Gwin v. Cupp et al
as 3:2009cv00342
Plaintiff:
Efrem F O'Gwin
Defendant:
Allen Cupp, Ham, Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Gusman et al
as 2:2009cv02784
Plaintiff:
Nolan C. Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Marlin Gusman, Dr. Gore and Dr. Ham
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
