Cases 21 - 30 of 76
HAYES v. LAWRENCE et al
as 2:2016cv08679
Plaintiff:
DARNELL HAYES
Defendant:
WYNN LAWRENCE, DONKEN and COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08154
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAYES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06219
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. HAYES, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER'S C.E.O et al
as 1:2016cv02681
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HAYES
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER'S C.E.O, CAPE MAY COUNTY'S FREE HOLDERS, GARY G. SCHAFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. CONMED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC et al
as 1:2016cv02680
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HAYES
Defendant:
CONMED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC, MELI, DENISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. WILDWOOD BY THE SEA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02679
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HAYES
Defendant:
WILDWOOD BY THE SEA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SPENCER SMITH, DEFENDANTS 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. NEALSON et al
as 1:2016cv02675
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HAYES
Defendant:
NEALSON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, GARY G. SCHAFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. CAPE MAY COUNTY'S CORRECTIONAL CENTER'S et al
as 1:2016cv02674
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HAYES
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY'S CORRECTIONAL CENTER'S, GARY G. SCHAFFER, DONALD J. LOMBARDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMALL v. WARREN et al
as 3:2015cv08886
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SMALL
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, ANTONIO CAMPOS, GANESH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KHALID v. NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2014cv02380
Plaintiff:
MUKHTAR KHALID
Defendant:
NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, N.J.S.P. TRENTON, NJ, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
