Cases 21 - 30 of 44
LOTT v. DOE et al
as 5:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
MACK HENRY LOTT
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
CHASTIN BETRON MOORE
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON, CLAUDIA HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOTT v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
MACK HENRY LOTT and HASKELL TORRENC
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON and JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lott et al v. McLaughlin et al
as 4:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Mack Henry Lott and Haskell Torrenc
Defendant:
Gregory McLaughlin, James Hinton and Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. HINTON et al
as 5:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LEE ROGERS
Defendant:
JAMES HINTON, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. FLENORY et al
as 5:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B BUTLER
Defendant:
BRANDON FLENORY, DON BLAKELY, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
TONY D THOMPSON
Defendant:
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
VERNIE A DURHAM
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON and Talisha Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAN v DOUGLAS et al
as 5:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE DEAN
Defendant:
DARREN J DOUGLAS, WILLIE REDDEN, Christopher Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2012cv00346
Plaintiff:
Devonta Davis
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, E. Caldwell, Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
