Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Robert Saunders v. Jack Markell, et al
as 13-1950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK MARKELL, ANDREW H. LIPPSTONE, PERRY PHELPS and others
Kostyshyn v. Markell, et al
as 1:2013cv00364
Petitioner:
Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent:
Jack Markell, Karl Hines, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kostyshyn v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv00527
Petitioner:
Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent:
P. Morgan, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Jack Markell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kostyshyn v. Cauthen et al
as 1:2011cv01141
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Angelo Cauthen, Rodderick L. Johnson, Jr., P. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Markell et al
as 1:2011cv01078
Petitioner:
Robert Saunders
Respondent:
Jack Markell, Andrew H. Lippstone, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kostyshyn v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv01002
Petitioner:
Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent:
Carl Danberg, Jack Markell, P. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
Kostyshyn v. MHM Services et al
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
MHM Services, Ben Griffiths, Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Pedrick et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Allen Pedrick, John W. Polk, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn et al v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2010cv01071
Petitioner:
Patricia Kostyshyn and Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent:
State of Delaware, Jack Markell, Delaware Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
