Cases 21 - 30 of 477
McGee v. Doe
as 3:2023cv02957
Plaintiff:
Calvin McGee
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thurman v. John Doe
as 3:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Todge V. Thurman
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McQueen et al
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Eric Dejuan Jones
Defendant:
Unknown McQueen, John Doe and Terry Aldright
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
William L Floyd
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pool v. Doe
as 5:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Teddy Pool
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Collins v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Montarro Collins
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bridges v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Xavier Bridges
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McConnell v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
CleDarreyell L. McConnell
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Officer John Doe, Robertson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. John Doe
as 3:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Daniel Derrell Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kirksey v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D. Kirksey
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
