Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Li v. Sessions et al
as 6:2017cv06458
Petitioner:
Yiu Wing Li
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions, III, John F. Kelly and Robert Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Alexander v. Decker
as 1:2017cv05002
Respondent:
Thomas R. Decker , John F. Kelly and Jeff Sessions
Petitioner:
Erron Lennon Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nguti v. Sessions, III
as 17-2086
Petitioner - Appellee:
Edwin Fru Nguti
Respondent - Appellant:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, Attorney General of the United States, John F. Kelly, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Thomas P. Brophy, Acting Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Menendez-Rodriguez v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv04809
Respondent:
Thomas Decker , Scott Mechkowski , Thomas D. Homan and others
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Menendez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Navichoque v. Kelly et al
as 5:2017cv03578
Petitioner:
Gustavo Navichoque
Defendant:
John F. Kelly, Jefferson B. Sessions, III, David W. Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03717
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01161
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
