Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03079
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
LYNCH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv02179
Plaintiff:
JOHN J LYNCH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SETH WILLIAMS, MATHEW WHITE D.A.'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. BERKS COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM et al
as 5:2018cv01275
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ANTHONY JAMES BUTLER
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM, BERKS COUNTY PAROLE + PROBATION and BERKS COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOBBINS v. FIRST JUDICIAL ATTORNEY
as 2:2018cv00151
Petitioner:
CHARLES DOBBINS
Respondent:
FIRST JUDICIAL ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TUTORA v. 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 2:2017cv05185
Petitioner:
TOLEKSIS TUTORA
Respondent:
1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LEIDENHEIM, HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAUSO v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2017cv04721
Plaintiff:
GENNARO RAUSO
Defendant:
ANGELA MARTINEZ, DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, MARY MCFALL HOPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. HAMMOND et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DOUGLAS LITTLE
Defendant:
GREGORY J. HAMMOND , 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA , EVA C. STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washam v. MaHallay et al
as 1:2015cv02397
Plaintiff:
Thomas S Washam
Defendant:
Lawrence MaHallay, Kathleen Kane and Office of Judicial Support of Delaware County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
