Cases 21 - 30 of 269
Jackson v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01991
Petitioner:
Kyle Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2022cv01993
Petitioner:
Kyle Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Henderson v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 4:2022cv01851
Petitioner:
Jordan S. Henderson
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2022cv01834
Petitioner:
James A. Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2022cv00834
Petitioner:
Tremaine Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
samson jackson
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Police Department, david dozier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Binyah et al v. Wallace et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
Yadi'el Amrum Binyah, Teresa Ruth Payton and IN RE: {S.N.W.}
Respondent:
Helen Wallace, Magistrate Durden, Trial Court Juvenile Div. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tyson v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 3:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Duran Tyson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
