Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Houk v. Walker et al
as 2:2008cv01100
Petitioner:
Larry N. Houk
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Campbell v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2008cv00293
Plaintiff:
Maurice C. Campbell
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Roderick Q. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Walker
as 3:2008cv00005
Petitioner:
Mark McCain Lowe
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Hicks
as 1:2007cv02802
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Walker
Defendant:
Juanita Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. Walker
as 4:2007cv02882
Petitioner:
John Anthony Duke, Sr
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Walker
as 3:2007cv01006
Petitioner:
Robert Garcia
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodney Bernard Hall v. Jimmy Walker
as 2:2007cv02858
Petitioner:
Rodney Bernard Hall
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullin v. Walker
as 2:2007cv00682
Petitioner:
Earl Ira Mullin
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Walker, et al
as 2:2007cv00584
Petitioner:
Brandon Ruiz
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Department Of Corrections State of Florida et al
as 0:2007cv60078
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Walker
Defendant:
Department Of Corrections State of Florida, Department Of Corrections State of Florida and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
