Cases 21 - 30 of 237
FRAZIER v. KUHN et al
as 2:2022cv02781
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ROBERT E. CARTER, ASST. SUPT. ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EL v. KELSEY
as 1:2022cv02292
Petitioner:
NOBLE CHRISTO EL and JONES, CHRISTOPHER NATHAN
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID KELSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JONES
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS and HERBERT SYMCEZK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RYAN v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RYAN
Defendant:
R. ROBINSON, T. JONES and M. CASTELLANOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JERMINE JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS and BRIAN M. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GANT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv17766
Plaintiff:
RONALD HOWARD GANT, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, DR. NEAL JONES and EVELYN OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOBY v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY DRUG COURT PROBATION et al
as 3:2021cv17222
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. DOBY
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY DRUG COURT PROBATION, JUDGE ROBERT JONES, AKEESHA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 1:2021cv15798
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JONES
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, NAKIA BOWMAN, CONSOLATA MULLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. FUSCO et al
as 2:2021cv14220
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JONES
Defendant:
LT. FUSCO and JOHN DOE 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv13625
Plaintiff:
KLAY JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, BRIAN HUGES, C.F.G. HEALTH SERVICE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
