Cases 21 - 30 of 340
Aurel v. North Branch Correctional Institution Officer's Mail Room et al
as 1:2022cv01741
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
North Branch Correctional Institution Officer's Mail Room, Warden J. Hines and K. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Arnold
as 1:2022cv01393
Petitioner:
Dennis Prince Barnes
Respondent:
Keith K. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearsall v. State Of Maryland
as 1:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
Danny K Pearsall
Defendant:
State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Officer McPhearson et al
as 1:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Stacey Bradley
Defendant:
Officer McPhearson, Lt. Mills, Warden of MCIH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
McLendon v. Green et al
as 1:2022cv01303
Plaintiff:
Juan McLendon
Defendant:
Robert L. Green, Wayne Hill, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hitchens v. Malagari
as 1:2022cv01302
Plaintiff:
Michael Hitchens
Defendant:
Warden Susan K. Malagari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Yutzy et al
as 1:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Zachary D. Battle
Defendant:
J. Yutzy, A. Carr, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Junior v. Malagari
as 1:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Ronald Francois Junior
Defendant:
Warden Susan K. Malagari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pevia v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Pevia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corr Wayne Hill, G. Warren, Warden, R. Roderick, Asst. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Rusasene Malcome Watson
Defendant:
Gail Watts and Officer K. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
