Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Kaufman v. Upton
as 4:2014cv00536
Petitioner:
Kathaleena Kaufman
Respondent:
Jodi Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holland v. Kaufman County Jail et al
as 3:2014cv00424
Petitioner:
Howard Columber Holland
Respondent:
Kaufman County Jail and NFN Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kaufman v. Stephens
as 6:2013cv00310
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Cleo Russell Kaufman
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Geary Mohammed Mills
Defendant:
Ernest Gonzalez, Steven Paul Maurizio, Eric Dockery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mills v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2012cv01912
Plaintiff:
Geary Mohamned Mills
Defendant:
Ernest Gonzalez, Steven Paul Maurizio, Eric Dockery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hines v. Countryman et al
as 3:2011cv02938
Plaintiff:
William Hines
Defendant:
Chris Countryman and Kaufman County Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGibboney v. Bayda et al
as 4:2010cv04781
Plaintiff:
Odie McGibboney
Defendant:
Mr. Bayda, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and Kaufman County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kaufman Co Sheriff's Office, et al
as 3:2010cv00703
Plaintiff:
Justin Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Kaufman County Sheriff's Office, David A Byrnes, William J Fortner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargrove v. Fortner et al
as 3:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lloyd Hargrove
Defendant:
William Fortner, Kaufman County Sheriff's Dept, David Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cootes v. Kaufman County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2010cv00355
Plaintiff:
David Lee Cootes
Defendant:
Kaufman County Sheriff's Department and Jacob Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
