Cases 21 - 30 of 186
Blow v. Holden et al
as 6:2020cv00581
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lamaine Blow and Joe
Defendant:
Jason Arthur, Phil Archer, Robert Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gaon v. Lau et al
as 1:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Jane Chern, Stanlake Ye, Ken Chaffee and others
Plaintiff:
Amos Gaon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. City of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv06951
Defendant:
A. Gemignani, Eddie Johnson, City of Chicago Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilton Mincy v. Los Angeles County Sheriff et al
as 2:2019cv04867
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriff Dept., Deputy Sheriff Ulloa, Deputy Sheriff Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Hilton Mincy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thomas v. Davey et al
as 1:2019cv00333
Defendant:
Thomas, Garcia, David Davey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilton Mincy v. Los Angeles County California et al
as 2:2019cv01319
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriff Dept., Jane Doe, Los Angeles County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Hilton Mincy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lau v. State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety, et al
as 1:2018cv00401
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lau
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Does 1-50, Francis Siqueira and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins et al v. Yordy et al
as 1:2018cv00292
Defendant:
Borg, A Weed, Lau and others
Plaintiff:
John and Jane Does and Faron R. Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Char v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Defendant:
Anthony Smith, Ashley Stibbard, Alan Lu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crisp v. Corizan Medical Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv12317
Plaintiff:
Maurice Crisp
Defendant:
Corizan Medical Services Inc, Michigan Department of Corrections, Velsicol Chemical Corp. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
