Cases 21 - 30 of 78
FORTUNE v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2018cv03899
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE MAHALLY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
TYRONE FORTUNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALTERS v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2018cv03722
Petitioner:
BRIAN WALTERS
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHIPLEY v. MAHALLY et al
as 3:2018cv00067
Petitioner:
JOHN R. SHIPLEY
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY , KELLY CALLIHAN and JOSH D. SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Huntley v. Mahally et al
as 4:2018cv00729
Petitioner:
Vincent V. Huntley
Respondent:
Lawrence Mahally and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Barbour et al
as 3:2018cv00515
Plaintiff:
Tamenend Matthews
Defendant:
Sherry Barbour, Diane Yale, Lawrence Mahally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvin v. Mahally et al
as 3:2017cv02254
Plaintiff:
Lauren Harvin
Defendant:
Lawrence Mahally, Zakarauska, Demming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2017cv05477
Petitioner:
ANTHONY THOMAS
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. MAHALLY et al
as 1:2017cv00257
Petitioner:
DONALD SMITH
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF VENANGO COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Mahally et al
as 3:2017cv01647
Petitioner:
Charles Sims
Respondent:
Lawrence Mahally , John E. Wetzel , John J Talaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murray v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2017cv01637
Plaintiff:
Bray Jibril Murray
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Lawrence Mahally, Zakarauska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
