Cases 21 - 30 of 188
(PC) Lloyd v. Ochoa
as 1:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Adrian Juan Lloyd
Defendant:
Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones v. Wranke et al
as 1:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Vernon H. Wranke, Corey M. Gibson, Lloyd Pareira, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Mize v. Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2022cv01322
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott Mize
Defendant:
Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department, D. Lloyd, Ayon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mize v. Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2022cv06061
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott Mize
Defendant:
Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department, D Lloyd, Ayon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd R. Gilbert v. People of The State of California
as 5:2022cv01324
Petitioner:
Lloyd R. Gilbert
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2022cv03275
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2022cv02872
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Bonilla
Defendant:
Beth Labson Freeman and Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Davis v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Clifton Davis
Defendant:
Rick Hill, Brown, R. Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adrian Juan Lloyd v. C. Pfeiffer
as 2:2021cv09235
Petitioner:
Adrian Juan Lloyd
Respondent:
C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.