Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Robinson v. Taylor et al
as 9:2016cv00285
Plaintiff:
Rendell Robinson
Defendant:
James Taylor, Chad St. John, Jeffrey Prieur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abreu v. Travers et al
as 9:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Travers, Lashway, Kornigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Uhler et al
as 9:2014cv01419
Plaintiff:
Servisio Simmons
Defendant:
D. Uhler, S. Lamare, W. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Uhler et al
as 9:2014cv01400
Plaintiff:
John White
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Reginald Bishop, T. Zermak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Lipka
as 9:2014cv01326
Plaintiff:
Herman Cruz
Defendant:
N. Lipka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Gokey
as 14-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John H. White, AKA John White
Defendant - Appellee:
Paul Gokey, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, Ms. Hungerford, Upstate Correctional Facility, Menard, Lieutenant, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
White v. Williams
as 13-3856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John White
Defendant - Appellee:
P. Williams, R. Macwilliams, W. Garland and others
White v. William
as 13-3846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John White, AKA John H. White
Defendant - Appellee:
Patricia L. Williams, Corrections Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, Richard MacWilliams, Corrections Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, C. Demers, Corrections Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
White v. Beilein et al
as 9:2013cv00392
Plaintiff:
John H. White
Defendant:
Thomas A. Beilein, Daniel L. Stewart, Phyllis Harrison-Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Gordon et al
as 9:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cruz
Defendant:
A. Gordon, J. Burch, D. Huse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
