Cases 21 - 30 of 72
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv04259
Plaintiff:
SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, STEPHEN D'ILIO, STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLBRY et al v. PIER et al
as 3:2017cv06928
Petitioner:
BRIAN COLBRY and STEPHANIE COLBRY
Respondent:
LISA VON PIER, ALLISON BLAKE, JULIE M. MARINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv06898
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAVIS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY L. LANIGAN, VICTOR TAPIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LISA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2017cv02880
Petitioner:
PETER LISA
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JOHN POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FANIEL v. WARDEN
as 3:2017cv02790
Petitioner:
LISA J. FANIEL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF N.J. et al
as 1:2017cv01797
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF N.J., UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE (UCHC), UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY (UMDNJ) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLBRY et al v. PIER et al
as 3:2017cv00003
Petitioner:
BRIAN COLBRY and STEPHANIE COLBRY
Respondent:
LISA VON PIER, ALLISON BLAKE, JULIE M. MARINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv09164
Plaintiff:
LISA BROWN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHYE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08303
Plaintiff:
LISA WHYE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07077
Plaintiff:
LISA RENEE HICKS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
