Cases 21 - 30 of 507
Jackson v. Hindsman et al
as 9:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Respondent:
Lt. Benjamin Hindsman and Officer Mary Tolar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Marvin Dale Phillips
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Dr NFN Risko, Maria D Carrizales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00215
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jackson v. Hindsman et al
as 4:2023cv04214
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Lt. Benjamin Hindsman and Officer Mary Tolar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Rivera et al
as 2:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alvarado Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Rivera and Mary Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rippey v. USA
as 1:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Chrystal Marie Rippey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Carter v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
State of Texas, Grand Jury of Bexar County, Judicial District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desouze v. Ratzinger et al
as 4:2023cv03474
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Jorge Marie Bergoglio, The Roman Catholic Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muniz v. Hendrix et al
as 5:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Mary Muniz
Defendant:
NFN Hendrix, Chad Wheeler and Lubbock County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrasco v. Bell et al
as 2:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Joseph Carrasco
Defendant:
Anna Marie Bell, C.J. McElroy, Robert Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
