Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Ozment v. Armbrister
as 5:2021cv03209
Petitioner:
Matthew G. Ozment and Matthew Glenn Ozment
Respondent:
Jay Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03204
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader and Craig James Strader
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sam A. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matthews (ID 105040) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2021cv03171
Petitioner:
Joshua K. Matthews
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv03165
Petitioner:
Carlos Jawon Williams
Respondent:
Eric N. Williams and Matthew R. Erb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Centurion
as 5:2021cv03123
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Thomas
Defendant:
Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv03118
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Thomas
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, (fnu) Patterson, (fnu) Fulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv03116
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Thomas
Defendant:
Nicholas M. Greene, El Dorado Correctional Facility and Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowery et al v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03107
Defendant:
Todd Thomason, James Colgan, (fnu) (lnu) and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Wallingford, Ramaun Johnson, John E. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Astorga v. Dedeke et al
as 5:2021cv03108
Defendant:
Andrew Dedeke and Melissa Wardrop
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ernest Astorga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Hitchcock et al
as 2:2021cv02141
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Evan Hitchcock, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
